Analytics and Target

Separating Analytics and Target bundles

Adobe likes to sell Analytics and Target together because the blended number is easier to defend and harder to question. Pulling the two apart is the first thing a buyer should do, because you cannot negotiate a price you cannot see.

Published November 17, 2023

Marketing analyst studying performance dashboards on a monitor

Why Adobe prefers the bundle

Bundling Analytics and Target into one Experience Cloud line gives Adobe two advantages. The blended figure hides the unit price of each product, so you cannot tell whether you are overpaying for one to subsidize the other. And stepping down from a bundle is contractually and psychologically harder than dropping a single standalone product, which protects the whole number at renewal.

None of that serves the buyer. A bundle is a convenience for the seller dressed up as a discount for the buyer, and the supposed saving is impossible to verify precisely because the components are not priced separately.

What the blend hides

Inside the bundle, Analytics is metered on server calls and Target is metered on activities and audience volume. These are entirely different meters with different cost drivers, and blending them means a problem in one is invisible behind the other. You might be over committed on Analytics server calls while paying Target premium pricing for features a fraction of activities use, and the single number shows none of it.

Separation exposes both. Once each product carries its own unit price you can see which one is driving the cost, which one is over committed, and which one you could step down or drop without touching the other.

How to pull the two apart

Ask Adobe for the standalone price of each product, not the bundle, and put each on its own meter and its own commitment in the analysis. Then read real usage against each: server call volume for Analytics, activity and audience volume for Target. The two pictures rarely tell the same story, and that difference is your leverage.

If Adobe resists separating the line, that resistance is itself informative. A genuine discount survives transparency. A blend that only works when you cannot see inside it does not.

Negotiating each on its own terms

With visible unit prices you negotiate each product for what it is. Right size the Analytics server call commitment, cap its overage, and benchmark its rate. Separately, decide whether Target premium is justified or whether standard covers your real personalization use, and right size that commitment too. You may keep both, but you keep them on terms you set.

The buyer side outcome is two products each priced, benchmarked, and committed to on its own merits, with no cross subsidy hidden inside a blended figure you were never meant to decode.

Keep reading in this series

This article sits in our Analytics and Target cluster. Start with the pillar, then these related reads.

Facing an Adobe renewal, audit, or runaway bill?

Adobe Negotiation Experts is an independent buyer side advisor. We sit on your side of the table to cut Adobe cost and reset your terms. Book a Negotiation Review and we will tell you where the leverage is.

Book a Negotiation Review See how we work

A bundle you cannot decode is a price you cannot challenge. Separate Analytics and Target, put a unit price on each, and negotiate the two on their own merits rather than as one number Adobe controls.

The Adobe Leverage Brief

One Adobe cost or negotiation teardown every week. Read by procurement and IT teams.